Functional Faith (4) - Meaning
8 November 2006 by Gil
The last of Volf’s four elements of a ‘functional faith’ is meaning and this completes his portrait of what a healthy faith looks like. This is, in my opinion, the most basic and fundamental of faith’s functions. When faith is operating according to its design it is helping us to understand and interpret the meaning behind the experiences of our lives.
Here the basic observation is that all of us have an innate desire to discover meaning behind the things that we do (or seek to do) and the experiences that we face. It seems to be a uniquely human capacity and longing to go beyond the surface, beyond the appearance of things and into a vague, shadowy realm where we wonder about the meaning (if any) behind it all. But we rarely stop to wonder why this longing, this relentless drive is a part of who we are as human beings. None of us are content with ‘the facts’, we all need to interpret them and to impose some kind of meaning on them.
So this is the function that faith in God (or whatever else we put our trust in) seeks to provide. From the Christian perspective, faith in God provides a point of orientation around which we organize our hopes and aspirations, our disappointments and failures, our efforts and our struggles. The meaning behind all of these realities of life is tied up in the story of a good world, created by a good God that is struggling to retain its true image, an image that has been lost and distorted due to human sin. This struggle has been overcome by the God of the universe taking on the sin and pain of the world and overcoming it by love. The cross is overcome by the resurrection, death is swallowed up in victory.
This provides the interpretive clue that explains the frustration that we all experience living in a world where reality does not often meet expectation. It also helps us to understand and celebrate those moments when we get glimpses of the healing that will one day characterize all that God has made.
This also gives meaning to the things that we do here and now. God’s purpose is simply this restoration of all things. We can have confidence that nothing that we do that contributes to that goal (whether in our own personal lives or in the lives of the world in which we participate) will be lost. The fear that we have is that everything we work for is for nothing, that everything will be buried under the ‘rubble of history’ and that we ourselves will be forgotten and that the whole thing will have no meaning. It is our faith in a God of resurrection makes all the difference in the world.
“Every act of faithful service, every honest labour to make the world a better place, which seemed to have been forever lost and forgotten in the rubble of history, will be seen on that day to have contributed to the perfect fellowship of God’s kingdom… all who have committed their work in faithfulness to God will be by him raised up to share in the new age, and will find that their labour was not lost, but that it has found its place in the completed kingdom.”
Just a question that popped into my mind from reading your last few posts - and I know you’ve kind of answered this already…
Do you think that the actual term/word “faith” is unique to Christianity? Can one correctly refer to the beliefs of another religion using the term “faith”? I think that the Christian meaning of faith is definately unique, but I wonder if the word itself is somehow unique to Christianity…
Jessica,
I agree that the term ‘faith’ in this kind of context can be very ambiguous. I don’t hold the term ‘faith’ to be one that would refer only the the Christian faith. I think we’ve gravitated toward ‘faith’ as a culture because it seems more ‘neutral’ than actually mentioning the name of God.
I’m not sure there’s a way to avoid this in a context of pluralism. ‘Faith’ will always refer to the human experience of the divine. I worry a bit about the long term effects of this shift in vocabulary - if our conversations about religion focus exclusively on the human dimension of that reality, then God eventually becomes a figment of our imaginations (at least in our public conversations).
what do you mean by ‘human experience of the divine?’ is that the same thing as experiencing the presence of another human or do you mean trying to understand the idea of God?
watch out gil! someone might hold you accontable for what you say, who knows you might even get sued!!
JC,
I think that referring to faith as ‘trying to understand the idea of God’ would not be enough. I was meaning our knowledge of God along with our experience of God (however pronounced or limited that experience might be).
then i suppose if you believe the christian God to be the only true God then only experiences of Him would be authentic. people of other faiths who claim experience would be claiming false experiences. so that may be what is unique about the christian faith… authentic religious experience. agree?
I think it is important to note that calling a religious experience “Christian” does not thereby authenticate that experience. Most of us who have grown up in some dialogue with the Christian tradition can probably point to numerous instances where people claimed to be having an experience of God when on most other people’s views that was quite clearly not the case.
I think that Christians can have false experiences of God and non-Christians can have true ones. Our ability to properly identify or label these experiences does not affect the truth value of the experience. If a Christian has a ‘religious experience’ whereby it was divinely communicated to them that they needed a Lexus to boost their self-esteem (I’m not making this up, believe it or not!) I would say that this experience is false, just as I would say that someone who claimed to have a ‘religious experience’ from some non-Christian source which told them to love God and love their neighbour as themselves, had a true experience of God. I think that there is a fairly strong stream of thinking within Christianity that would affirm that God does not restrict his revelation or influence to those within the confines of institutional Christianity.
I agree with Ryan. I would add that I do believe the God revealed in Jesus Christ is the most authentic revelation of God available. If I didn’t believe that, why I would call myself a Christian. But that certainly does not authenticate every ‘experience’ that claims to be Christian’.